Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urreligion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Urreligion

Urreligion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable or not popular in English German term. Jim Carmel (talk) 19:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. article is well referenced. Also source article for a couple of redirects. If problem with name then rename, don't AfD. Check backlinks.--Sting Buzz Me... 01:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:NFT - even if it is an obvious made up word, it is still a made up word --T-rex 00:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
  • "not for things made up one day"? {{huh}}? Even if the day in question is a sunny afternoon in 1832, and the guy making it up a towering figure like Goethe? I am sorry, but I think this vote should be discounted as ostensibly not pertaining to this AfD (did you click on the wrong 'edit' link or something?) --dab (𒁳) 07:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, well-referenced article. Note, for further input, I'm notifying the original author (User:Dbachmann) who created this as a redirect to Primeval religion which was redirected to Origin of religion, which he then expanded under the current name. --MPerel 01:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
• keep (speedy). It has occurred to me to merge Urmonotheismus into Urreligion though, since the two topics are closely related. --dab (𒁳) 07:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.