Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urbana Kolkata
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Urbana Kolkata[edit]
- Urbana Kolkata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article appears to be written like an advertisement, violating WP:NOTADVERTISING. It also violates WP:CRYSTAL because it contains unsourced predictions and speculations about an upcoming building. No references in the article and almost all the external links in it appear to be spam and used manly for promotional purposes. Lack of notability is another issue. jfd34 (talk) 10:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems impossible to find anything of substance online about this proposed(?) building, outside of real estate listings. Definitely not of any great note at the moment. Sionk (talk) 10:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL if the subject is true what it claims then it will have coverage later on and an article can be created, if it really becomes notable as claimed. --DBigXray 20:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable as of now. If the said thing happens; If reliable sources available at that point of time, then one can always re-create the said page again with reliable references as per wiki rules. So delete for now. --Bharathiya (talk) 19:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.