Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Romantic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 18:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Romantic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Improperly sourced. There is only one source, which brings its notability into question. Also, the "source" is an Amazon-like retail website that was simply selling the album, which is now out of print. JimmyPiersall (talk) 17:36, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 17:37, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've added its sourced chart history; it meets WP:NALBUM, "The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart." (Disclosure: I am the original article creator.)

Note, this AFD and the substantially simultaneous AFD for Jack Thomas (academic), another article I created, appear to have been made in retaliation for my reversion of the nom's most recent unsourced addition of trivia to List of references to Cleveland in popular culture. Both articles were nominated immediately after his repetition of the edit and comment about it on my talk page; and in neither case did the nom notify me of the AfD. That being said, I created this article over a decade ago, when I was not as adroit about Wikipedia ways, in particular about sourcing, and do not object to deletion of an article that doesn't merit inclusion, whether it originated with me or not. TJRC (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per TJRC, meets WP:NALBUM. Meeanaya (talk) 05:46, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - though it could use some more sources from pro reviews and the like (if there are any). Significant chart placement in Japan makes the case, and the AfD nomination is suspect anyway. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 13:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.