Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Extreme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Extreme[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only notable thing about this game is that it was made by Data Design Interactive, who is infamous for making games that receive very negative reception. Nilocla ^{♈ ☮} 01:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could not find any significant coverage for this game. Reach Out to the Truth 02:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The fact that the company article has been nominated for deletion (consensus there appears to be 'keep' in any case) has no bearing on the notability of this game. Neither does a negative reception. A notability tag informing interested users of the need to improve references might be more appropriate. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Listed in reliable sources, but no reviews or acclaim beyond that. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note There should be reviews in off-line publications. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If any can be added, I'm all for keep. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I won't be able to help with PS2 reviews, but the game was released on the Wii and I have a pile of Nintendo magazines that I can have a look through. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 10:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

redirect and maybe merge to publisher. Hobit (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.