Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Design Associates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Design Associates[edit]

Urban Design Associates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Phoenix-based Urban Design Associates does not appears to not meet the minimum criteria for company notability for inclusion in Wikipedia. It appears this article is linked to by only one other Wikipedia article, and that the company is a small five person firm (three of the five being related family members), and the article appears to have been written and posted by the firm's founder simply cutting-and-pasting the content from their website. - see Talk:Urban_Design_Associates AliceStanley11 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:08, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as corporate spam with its hallmark -- external links in body. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:08, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no mention in published works found online beyond a couple of list entries for private houses in Professional Builder. Not to be confused with the firm of the same name based in Pittsburgh, which could well achieve notability [1]: Noyster (talk), 18:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.