Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Areas of Twin Cities Minnesota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 06:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Areas of Twin Cities Minnesota[edit]

The subject is covered fully in Twin cities and there is no reason of an article or redirection with the name Urban Areas of Twin Cities Minnesota to exist. Moreover, the article is orphan. Magioladitis 14:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is a very short article, it's orphaned, it already has a merge tag, and it is covered by another article. I would have prodded this one, Magiladitis. Evilclown93_(talk) 14:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above, redudant orphan article that offers no new information worth merging. Arkyan ^(talk) 15:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above Nips 16:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. NSR77 ^T_C 18:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant Capmango 22:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. — Wen li 22:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge/Redirect to Twin Cities or appropriate/related Twin Cities article--JForget 23:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 11:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- covered much better in Minneapolis-Saint Paul. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 18:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.