Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uptown Toka Clique

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Since when can a bunch of pot-heads get up enough energy to form a gang? err... oh, never mind :P. ---J.S ^(T/C) 20:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uptown Toka Clique[edit]

Would normally nominate for speedy deletion as a non-notable gang, but the article mentions some "notable" events, so decided it would be best to send through AFD. There aren't any links to reliable sources regarding the gangs actions and the only links google returns are links to Wikipedia and forks. Bobblehead 02:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN gang. TJ Spyke 02:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wow, an article with zero sources about an "emerging" gang of "marijuana smokers". Seeing alot of "supposedly", "reportedly", "possibly", and other weasel words. Fails to provide verifiability of truth or notability backed by reliable sources and is 100% speculation and original ressearch and so fails criteria for inclusion. NeoFreak 02:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "The Uptown Toka Clique (UPTC) are a street gang started in the 14th ward of the Uptown neighborhood of New Orleans, Louisiana in early 2006 by a reportedly small group of habitual marijuana users." I stopped reading there. --- RockMFR 03:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Borderline speedy. MER-C 04:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN, fails WP:VP. Davidpdx 14:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable gang. JIP | Talk 17:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete small time gang, not in the news... not that we are encoraging them to get on the news. *hides from angry gang members* FirefoxMan 18:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WMMartin 15:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.