Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upstream Ideas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Upstream Ideas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty obscure webcast/radio commentary operation. Also, utterly unsourced: every single reference is from Upstream Ideas itself. Calton | Talk 09:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – due complete absence of secondary sourcing to indicate notability as per WP:GNG, and due to the article appearing to be at least somewhat promotional in nature rather than encyclopedic. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage exists. SL93 (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.