Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upside down font
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Upside down font[edit]
Not particularly verifiable, it's written as though it's a very weak spoiler encryption technique along the lines of ROT13. If there's a page on "webpage spoiler hiding", it deserves to be merged there, otherwise it should probably be weakly deleted. I've listed it primarily because it was tagged as speedy, which I don't think applies. stillnotelf has a talk page 05:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as having no sources and nothing on Google, original research, WP:NFT. Sandstein 06:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research --TBC??? ??? ??? 06:15, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The Upside Down "font" is intended to be read left to right, but only as if the monitor is rotated 180 degrees. This is notable in what way? Original research covers this - look for the guy with the upside-down monitor. (aeropagitica) 06:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and speedy BJAODN, as it reads like it's honestly trying to pass itself as a legitimate "encryption" method. --Kinu t/c 07:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. --Khoikhoi 08:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Original research. - Andre Engels 08:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN or plain delete. OR and non-notable. JIP | Talk 14:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm the original author. I'll accept deletion due to original research criteria. I've used the font/encryption method personally for several years. Crythias 16:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per author. Perhaps BJAODN too. --Karnesky 16:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.