Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper Tamakoshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. AfD nominator has withdrawn their nomination. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 08:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Upper Tamakoshi

Upper Tamakoshi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGDEPTH JMHamo (talk) 13:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

• WITHDRAWING MY NOMINATION as the article has been significantly improved. JMHamo (talk) 01:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete For now. --Zaalim (talk) 03:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete for now and I actually fixed this before User:Sphilbrick deleted it and I've been meaning to restore it to its better state. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• Keep I think this can be rescued and have started working on it. Brianhe (talk) 22:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The rescue is fairly complete now. Brianhe (talk) 03:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

• Keep in light of above and current state of article now that it's being worked. Appable (talk) 23:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.