Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Updata Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Updata Partners[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a prime candidate for speedy deletion, though another editor has already opposed a PROD attempt, so clearly there is some opposing view. Article is cited only to the company website and I can't see any evidence online of reliable, independent coverage that would meet WP:NCORP (Company seems to be a behind-the-scenes investor so perhaps isn't very visible or interesting to the general media). Appears to be written by a single issue editor, maybe with a promotional intent? Time for it to go. Sionk (talk) 22:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unfortunately. The companies in its portfolio are covered all over the place, but I can't find any specific coverage of Updata to save this one. Alaynestone (talk) 03:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply not enough with Books finding listings and News links. Pinging past editors RA0808, Stuartyeates and Iridescent for comment. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I said in my PROD Non-notable company. No independent refs with in depth coverage.. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I concur with the above info. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 18:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability does not seem to have materialized, and still seems to be more about promotion than information. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.