Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UpShow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UpShow[edit]

UpShow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not seem to meet NCORP--ther references are either PR or notices about funding or not independent--the Forbes source was written by the company's president, though you cant tell this from the way the reference is displayed. DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on sources for the next few days. Any other suggestions welcome. (T) —Preceding undated comment added 04:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as paid-for spam about an unremarkable startup. Fails WP:CORP. MER-C 10:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - looks to be a WP:NCORP failure; the article cites sources, but all seem to be violations of what GNG and NCORP view to be reliable, in-depth sources—the citing of funding announcements and press releases (both of which do not establish notability per NCORP) is the main issue. WP:PRIMARY is another concern, as several sources incorporate interviews with company staff and the aforementioned press releases essentially parrot the company's announcements.--SamHolt6 (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with tags May be noteable but needs work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100E:B105:5182:9942:66F:D470:22B3 (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.