Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UpManager Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili ^說嗎? 02:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UpManager Software[edit]

The article does not assert notability and does not seem to meet WP:CORP's criteria for inclusion. The author, Andrewhill (talk · contribs), has only made edits to this article and one other that added a link to this article, leading me to believe this is vanispamcruftisement that should be deleted. — Saxifrage ✎ 00:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Royboy crashfan 00:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There aren't references that validate it. The onus is on the editor to provide these. Tyrenius 00:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP. AndyZ _t 01:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. DarthVad e r 02:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn company. --Ter e nc e Ong 02:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom Deizio 02:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sorry Guy 03:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to fail WP:CORP criteria. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 04:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 09:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable business that does not meet WP:CORP. — TheKMan^talk 20:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.