Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Suraj Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 14:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Suraj Project[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:TOOSOON ,even the name of the film is unknown. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hammer it into oblivion. (In simpler terms, delete.) G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

And WP:INDAFD: Suraj's next Jayam Ravi's next

~~Redirect~~ Merge (for now) to director Suraj. Having its title undisclosed does not mean the topic of this upcoming film is somehow unsourcable.[1][2][3][4][5] And in considering sourcability of this topic, calling for WP:HAMMER is a bit of overkill, really. We can allow reversal of the redirect when filming is confirmed. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you want to redirect something that doesn't even have a title yet? You can recreate the article (under the title) when it is announced. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 20:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully Agree with S Palmer this is not a title and further None of Purposes of Redirect are meet.See no point redirecting it.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ G S Palmer and Pharaoh of the Wizards: Sorry... I meant to type merge (now corrected) as we do have sourcable information that can be spoken of in context to the director's career. And we can protect the article history for recreation or undeletion once notability is more firmly established under WP:NFF (paragraph 3. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete too early இது இன்னும் உறுதிப்படுத்தப்படவில்லை. 182.65.161.78 (talk) 14:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Merge (for now) to director Suraj.MADRASS2014 (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HAMMER - this is a classic case. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.