Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Santosh Srinivas film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:REFUND applies. There is clear consensus that this shouldn't be an article at Wikipedia, in its current state. What is rather unclear is what to do about it. There is no discussion regarding PC78's proposal, for or against. Therefore I seriously considered re-directing. However, given the awkward naming of the article, it seems unlikely that any editor wishing to create a viable article on the subject would know to look for a re-direct, and much under which "title" to look under. Therefore I judge consensus by strength of arguments to be outright delete, but I will gladly restore to user space of any editor in good standing who makes such request. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Santosh Srinivas film[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON article about an unreleased film. As always, Wikipedia does not keep an article about every film that can be minimally sourced as having entered the production pipeline -- with extremely rare exceptions for hypernotable films on the order of the Star Wars franchise, most films are not notable until they have been released, and thereby received reviews from reputable film critics, and a small bit of initial casting announcement coverage is not enough to make it a special case yet. Just because the director has a WP:BLP does not automatically mean we need to rush-job a premature article the moment he announces that he's working on something new — if you don't even know a title or anything about the plot yet, let alone an actual release date, then you need to wait until you do know those things before a standalone article becomes warranted. Bearcat (talk) 23:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:37, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Santosh Srinivas or move to Draft:Untitled Santosh Srinivas film. Why rush to delete an article that may only end up being recreated later? There are better ways to deal with this sort of thing. PC78 (talk) 22:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HAMMER Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.