Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Nancy Meyers Project

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will happily restore/userfy awaiting evidence that the film has a title, per the consensus here Fritzpoll (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Nancy Meyers Project[edit]

Untitled Nancy Meyers Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article about a film so early in the production process that it has no title. Only source is IMDB, which isn't reliable for these kind of things in general, as all sorts of bizarre rumors get in there. Per WP:CRYSTAL, it should be deleted until such time as there's something encyclopedic to say about it and multiple independent reliable sources talk about it. DreamGuy (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The film has already completed filming and was called Something Good. Within a few weeks, the title will be permanent as advertising is scheduled to start in early August in anticipation of it's Christmas release. If it's deleted, it will only be redone in a few weeks. Donmike10 (talk) 17:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC) I'm trying to figure out what the rush is to delete the article. This is a major Hollywood film only 6 months away and the name will be given in a matter of weeks with advertising around the corner. The director is the biggest female director (Nancy Meyers) of all time and the producer (Scott Rudin for No Country for Old Men) won the Academy Award last year.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Donmike10 (talk • contribs) [reply]
This editor voted twice, once without signing his name. I have removed one of the votes and combined the two. DreamGuy (talk) 17:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and WP:HAMMER. Once the film is released with notable sources/citable info, then the article can be recreated properly. SpikeJones (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete once it gets a name then recreate it under that name. Darrenhusted (talk) 21:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it's obviously a major studio film that's going to have a very large-scale release in only 6 months. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 01:47, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And why is that a reason to keep? DreamGuy (talk) 17:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and note the nominator's lack of quite easy WP:BEFORE. He states "Article about a film so early in the production process that it has no title.". Well, the lack of title to the film is something that will remedy itself within weeks as producers agree on just what to call it. More to the point, an easy search under "Untitled Nancy Meyers project" shows that THAT particular article title is suitable for this easily sourcable an encyclopedic article as THAT is specifically how it is (currently) referred in multiple reliable sources. The teaser trailer was put together in May 2008[1], casting had been proceding for months [2], and last members joined in May 2009 [3], [4], and filming began in April 2009 [5], [6], [7], and is still underway in Brooklyn [8]. It may not have a title (yet), but it already has a release date [9]. Considering the stars in the film, more will definitely follow. The film sure ain't WP:CRYSTAL and IS being discussed under that temporary non-name in-depth and in multiple reliable sources. An article name change will be a simple matter once it has been officially announced. WP:NFF applies, and no, the nice essay about probable music albums does not.. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It never ceases to amaze me how you can come up with a Leep vote for even the most obvious Deletes. When there's something to tal abot we'll have an article until then it's pointless. DreamGuy (talk) 17:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That something called the "Untitled Nancy Meyers Project" IS being discussed in-depth AND in reliable sources is plain. The amazment is mine at your attack on my reasoning, rationale, and efforts to improve the project through use of guideline and available sources. Please cease. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/Redirect. Yes, filming may have started, but I don't see anything of any substance, either in the links provided here or in my own searches. There is nothing that couldn't reasonably be covered at Nancy Meyers for now, so for me it doesn't pass WP:NFF. PC78 (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough information to warrant a page yet...it doesn't even have a title! magnius (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Untitled_Nancy_Meyers_Project&oldid=1069624732"