Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Jaren Anderson Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 22:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Untitled Jaren Anderson Project, Jaren Anderson, One Last Job

Group nomination - Where to begin? First item is an unnamed and non-yet made film by non-notable writer/director, the second item. Google search on Jaren Anderson brings back 88 returns, only 41 unique, and only a handful of those relating to film - and those are almost all Wikipedia links. Third item is a not yet released short film. Delete. TheRealFennShysa 23:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete nn. If it turns out notable we'll add it back later M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the first, definitely. It is rather easy to make a film these days, given modern technology, so the requirement should be that anyone actually is likely to go and see it. Only films with major distribution deals in advance of being filmed could possibly even begin to justify an article. As for Mr Anderson himself and One Last Job - New York Film Festival mentioned sounds impressive, yes, but it also describes itself as "the underground, low budget and non-mainstream festival", so it might be a step in the direction of success, but I'm not really convinced it's success in itself. Average Earthman 00:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Other Links for arguement:

• Disagree

Here are my takes, from research.

Check [[1]] under short fiction I nominations and [[2]] under Jaren Anderson as director and One Last Job as film.

Googled Jaren Anderson One Last Job and it brought up, 2 counts of Wikipedia, 1 count of NY film festival and 1 count of forest film, 2 counts of filmerica festival (where it seemed he made a short film for a 72 hour contest, donation charity, etc.).

I think as a viewer of film, and independent films all, shorts including films made by people with out 20 million dollar budgets, its unfair and people independent films (expecially ones that got nominations from film festivals and what not) should be fought for by wikipedians. More power to you.

Also, I remember looking this up a while ago when it first passed and remember it was IMDB.com but im not so sure anymore. Oh well, hope you guys give it a second look.

• delete Untitled Jaren Anderson Short film ---

I agree on this one only because its a short no credable film- I don't think this a true fact, that hes making this film... so I say delete, but one last job is indeed a film, and since I live near the west village theater in New york, I'm gonna see what its all about when it premieres.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.