Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsinkable 1912

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unsinkable 1912[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N. No search results for <"Unsinkable 1912">, <"Unsinkable 1912" film>, etc. Possibly WP:HOAX. jonkerz ♠talk 17:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a GNG failure. Note that this is the second and only other creation by the creator of the article How to save a life (2011), which is currently showing every indication of being a hoax. Carrite (talk) 19:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - No indication anywhere on the internet that such a film exists, so far as I can see. I'm going to drop a HOAX tag on this also, in wake of the content creator's other WP venture, feel free to revert if evidence surfaces that such a film exists. Carrite (talk) 19:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I have notified the content creator, User:Bravo369, of the hoax allegation, emphasized the severity of hoaxing at WP, and invited them to show up here to calm our concerns if this allegation is wrong. The closing administrator is advised that this is potentially a serial hoaxer involved here and that a wielding of the banhammer may be additionally called for. Carrite (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (barney) @ 23:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (orate) @ 23:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NF. Worse, the topic and principals fail WP:V. Film, director, producer, and cast are unverifiable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Appears to be a hoax, I can't find anything myself and the cast pages do not make mention of it either. The budget alone is suspicious enough without sourcing. Nothing turns up for Gary Mathews in a director capacity at all. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.