Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unseen University (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Withdrawn by nominator and all but one !votes for Keep. (non-admin closure) — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 08:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unseen University[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fictional university, as far as I can tell, fails WP:GNG. Additionally, it is made up of entirely plot summary, which is forbidden under WP:NOT. As for the previous AFDs, the last one was in 2010. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Schools. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly not a plot summary, but it does need more references. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 23:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain where the article mentions Unseen University's real-life importance or reception. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the sources I posted in the second AFD a dozen years ago. Most of those links still appear live. If you'd prefer, it is well within the nominator's remit to do up a source evaluation matrix on them. Jclemens (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources I brought up a dozen years ago and two AfDs back. Jclemens (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jclemens . If people don't want to keep as a standalone article, merge to Discworld, but I think it should be kept. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's possible, but creates all sorts of SIZE issues. Fact is, we have a bunch of sprawling articles that could all stand to be tightened up, but being poorly maintained is not a deletion criterion. Jclemens (talk) 00:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jclemens. Also Unseen University and Discworld have become part pf popular culture in many places. --Bduke (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jclemens Jack4576 (talk) 11:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appear to have missed those when looking through the page history. I would like to withdraw this AfD. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Discworld. The article is still 100% plot summary. If we have sources, then we had years for someone to write some reception/analysis section. Enough is enough. If noone cares for years to make this policy-compliant, redirect this until someone does. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.