Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsealed: Conspiracy Files

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. On behalf of the New World Order. Sandstein 09:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsealed: Conspiracy Files[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A conspiracy documentary series with little to no chance of notability; about section reads like an advertisement and possible chance of copyvio; probably too soon as well. --189.25.205.234 (talk) 01:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Created discussion page on behalf of the above IP editor. I offer no opinion on the nomination myself. --Finngall ^talk 03:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think we are way too open to listing all TV shows. What makes this notable? I see no independent sources. Did the show get any independent, reliable reviews? If so, list them here and ping me. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability - and I've had to remove the 'about' section as an unambiguous copyright violation. AndyTheGrump (talk) 08:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.