Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unocore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unocore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable neologism, fails WP:Madeup. Moreover the article reads like an opinion piece. De728631 (talk) 21:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 22:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, severely fails WP:MADEUP (and WP:N, of course). Glenfarclas (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only Ghits I can find are blogs and passing mentions on last.fm. The article also really talks more about ridicule of the band Rose Funeral than the supposed genre itself. Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It may look opinianted but they are true facts. People DO play Uno at rose funeral concerts and the band is often is refered to as Rose FUNOral. There are some UNOCORE bands now that mock the sound of Rose Funeral and make fun of them so it is a real genre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.65.90 (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO. -- The Anome (talk) 13:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.