Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unknown Component (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown Component[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN "music project" that seems to just be the efforts of a NN musician. No reliable sources discussing either one in the "significant detail" the GNG requires. Fails WP:BAND going away. Notability tagged for nearly eleven years

A previous AfD, back then, resulted in a botched close; it was relisted, and after the relisting had two Delete proponents (where, prior to the relist, one of the two keep proponents was the article creator, an SPA for whom this article is his sole Wikipedia activity); it *still* was closed no consensus. Ravenswing 00:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 00:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable music project. I also looked at the previous AfD and I saw the article was kept on the basis of "it has an Allmusic page (with no written content)". That's exactly when Allmusic is unreliable. Just being listed there with the biography page being blank does not indicate any notability. I also looked this project up and couldn't find anything besides the standard unreliable sources, and of course the rest of the results were stuff where the words "unknown" and "component" appear separately. And I say it again: We really need to stop single-purpose accounts. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No real way to do so that doesn't cost more than it's worth, really. What gums up the process considerably more are the deprodders and keep proponents who toss spanners into the works, without troubling themselves to find the reliable sources they claim really most sincerely must exist, possibly, kinda, maybe. A rant for another venue, though. Ravenswing 08:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 06:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the points made in this and the previous AfD discussion. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 08:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.