Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of New Mexico Retiree Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

University of New Mexico Retiree Association[edit]

University of New Mexico Retiree Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization Orange Mike | Talk 00:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete no indication of any significant coverage by any third party reliable sources. fails WP:GNG-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There doesn't seem to be any indication of notability. The references don't help. Six of seven are to the University of New Mexico site. The seventh is a retirement association, which doesn't appear to even mention UNMRA. My own searching didn't go any better. The closest newspaper hits were to AARP and New Mexico; only a couple of press releasees for UNMRA. A general search also failed (searching on "UNMRA" returns many more hits, but most are spurious). I guess it's possible a brief note about UNMRA could be made in the University of New Mexico article, but it might be too much detail to even mention it. It surely would be too much detail to propose a merge. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Larry/Traveling_Man and Fails WP:ORG and lacks third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.