Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of California, Irvine rescinded controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 06:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

University of California, Irvine rescinded controversy[edit]

University of California, Irvine rescinded controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An egregious 80-word violation of WP:CONTENTFORK, copy+pasted verbatim from the parent article (without attribution), for no discernible good reason. Softlavender (talk) 03:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_California,_Irvine&diff=793202689&oldid=792508948 Ethanbas (talk) 03:07, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  05:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  05:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  05:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  05:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...seriously? Redirect back to the parent article. No need for a separate one. WP:NOTNEWS and all that. ansh666 10:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Didn't notice that the title lacked the word "admissions" - delete as implausible redirect along with everything else wrong with it. ansh666 18:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:UNDUE. Note that the current title is completely unsuitable for a redirect and should be deleted. It makes no sense. "Rescinded controversy"???? If that phrase means anything, it means a controversy which has been rescinded. Possibly "University of California, Irvine rescinded admissions controversy", but I'm not sure any redirect is warranted for this utter trivia. Voceditenore (talk) 11:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Content fork that violates NOTNEWS. James (talk/contribs) 05:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Content fork L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.