Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Business

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

University Business[edit]

Contested speedy some time ago. This magazine is not notable, and is written like an advertisement, essentially by a single user. It does not link to any articles with WP, but to several websites outside WP, which is a telltale sign. YechielMan 23:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Another editor wrote in an edit summary: 46,100 subscribers is an assertion of notability. --Eastmain 02:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Doesn't appear notable. I am the editor that said 46,100 subscribers is an assertion of notability, and that's true, however asserting notability is only enough to survive speedy deletion, it's not enough to survive AfD - you have to actually be notable for that. --Tango 11:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Tango that this would not be a proper A7 speedy as notability is asserted but it is almost spammy enough to be a G11. In any event, low notability and high spam content should always result in a delete. If they really are notable someone will write a NPOV, sourced article. Eluchil404 10:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.