Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universidad de Chile Center for Byzantine and Neohellenic Studies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Although "merge" has a clear majority, the arguments in favor of merging (or deleting) appear rather perfunctory and most are mere votes, which leads me to conclude that there's no policy-informed rough consensus yet. If discussed further on the talk page, the merger proposal could, however, still find consensus. Sandstein 17:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Universidad de Chile Center for Byzantine and Neohellenic Studies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

individual single-university academic institutes of this sort are not usually considered notable in Wikipedia DGG ( talk ) 11:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:36, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to University of Chile which can be done without bringing this to AfD, unless there’s some reason why that won’t work? Mccapra (talk) 13:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as per above Dronebogus (talk) 14:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm the article's creator. I didn't know single-university academic institutes of this sort are not usually considered notable in Wikipedia. I confused Dumbarton Oaks with an university. However, besides I was planned to create Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso (PUCV) Roman Studies Week. The reason why I created that Study Journal, in first place was linked to Héctor Herrera Cajas (founder of PUCV Roman Studies Week) and, in second place, due to its existence in Wikipedia in Spanish (according the policy of contribute with translation), reason why also I created Miguel Castillo Didier.

This article creation hasn't as goal its only one existence, but to contribute with Chilean culture's conextion and expantion in that Wikipedia. As article's deletion table says, I really want to contribute and want to do it since the own academic production of Universidad de Chile Center for Byzantine and Neohellenic Studies researchers have done, but I don't have all the time in the world (precisely I study at university).Carigval.97 (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to University of Chile. desmay (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My initial reaction was to Merge as suggested. This is what is appropriate for the research programme of one academic probably with successive doctoral research students. However, this has rather more substance to it, so that we might treat it in a similar way to a named professorial post. Having said that much if it is a horrid article, far too much focused on the doctoral thesis of its second professor. Keep but prune. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are many cases where individual institutes linked to universities have articles. The article seem well-written and source and I see so far no argument for removing this as an independent article. There just some vague appeals to tradition "academic institutes of this sort are not usually considered notable in Wikipedia". That is not argument enought to merge or delete this article. Dentren | ^Talk 07:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to University of Chile. Srijanx22 (talk) 16:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.