Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universaltravel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. HappyCamper 02:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Universaltravel[edit]

Article as it stands: substub on non-notable travel agency. Article from history: Advertising for a non-notable travel agency. Much blanking, reverting etc of article inbetween. Article by new user, so benefit of doubt here rather than speedy (unless consensus otherwise, of course).➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 21:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete using db-empty. --OscarTheCat ^talk 22:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable enough (possible advert). --Latinus (talk (el:)) 16:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as {{db-nocontext}}. Stifle 00:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.