Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universalmoney Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A7) by Diannaa. Non-admin closure --Pgallert (talk) 06:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Universalmoney Records

Universalmoney Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn;t make sense RDN1F (don't) (talk) (to) (me) (before) (my) (coffee) (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

• I agree that the page is very confusing and doesn't make any reasonable claim for notability. Google search yields little as well. I'm going to say Delete the page in its current form, but if sources are provided, notability established and the article written a bit better at least, I have nothing against keeping the page. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

  A question I'd like to add: What sorcery are those talk page templates in the article? I thought I'd make it easier for anyone up for fixing the page by moving them to talk page but I couldn't find the templates in the source. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - db-corp or db-spam. I don't see a plausible claim of notability. There is a prior speedy tag on the article waiting for admin attention, so perhaps this AfD is premature. -- Rrburke (talk) 00:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.