Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Singles Chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Singles Chart[edit]

Suposedly a world-wide singles chart. Utterly non-notable or hoax - the only Google hit is Wikipedia itself. There is no explanation about who produces this chart, where and how it is produced, where it is published etc - in fact, nothing which would make the article encylopedic at all. Author removed the speedy tag but has added a bit more to it since so I am bringing it here - however with so little context I believe this is still a candidate (csd-a1). Speedy Delete. Ros0709 (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Delete all - no sources provided which prove that these charts exist. Likely a hoax. -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 08:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Interesting hoax by User:Tokiohotelclub. According to Tokio, the number one hit worldwide of 2000 would be Britney Spears' Born to Make You Happy, which wasn't released as a single in either the U.S. or Australia. Check of the contributions shows that he/she hasn't contaminated other articles with this nonsense. Mandsford (talk) 13:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
G3 all as hoaxes. No proof that this chart even exists. So tagged. (Thankfully, the author hasn't contaminated song pages with this bogus chart, unlike some other hoax charts I've seen. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 18:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.