Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Living Wage (ULW)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Living Wage (ULW)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a bona-fide soc/pol topic, but boils down to a poorly sourced promo piece. Fails WP:GNG / WP:V. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC) DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is clearly deficient, but can be improved through the normal editing process. For WP:GNG, it is not necessary for WP:RS/WP:IS to necessarily have been cited in the article itself...what's required is that such sources exist; WP:BEFORE shows they do for this topic. — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 19:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Concurring with Ad Meliora; some work is clearly needed on the article itself, but notable topic regardless. BlackholeWA (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.