Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unitel Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unitel Pictures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks sufficient independent coverage to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Available news sourcing consists of mentions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to parent company GMA Network. I'm also fine with Delete --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not owned by GMA; a redirect would suggest it is owned by the network, which isn't the case. Otherwise, a non-notable telenovela producer out of many. Nate • (chatter) 23:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 11:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.