Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Student Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 19:58, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

United States Student Association[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims to notability are unsubstantiated. I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been tagged for notability for 7years; time it was resolved. Boleyn (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Never heard of it, but 191 results in Google News Search and its dating to 1947 seem to mean it is notable. It's just a very weak, poorly sourced article. —Мандичка^YO 😜

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, appears to pass WP:GNG, see Glenn H. Utter (12 September 2011). Youth and Political Participation: A Reference Handbook: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 216. ISBN 978-1-59884-662-1. The subject also has received multiple mentions in a multitude of reliable sources (whether those mentions are significant or not is a matter of debate).--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this used to be important, when I was in college, but that's anecdotal. We may need to userfy or fix it quickly. Bearian (talk) 21:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - based on a quick web search, seems to meet WP:GNG. often mentioned by AFL-CIO Moonboy54 (talk) 01:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination Thanks for convincing me, Boleyn (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.