Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Indoor Football League
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
United States Indoor Football League[edit]
- United States Indoor Football League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Definitely non-notable; website has not been updated since May 11, several deadlines for the schedule and team lineup announcement have been missed, very few (if any) true independent sources, cannot find a website for any team besides the Outlawz and Surge. With the summer heating up, time is definitely running out for a summer launch; if there is any further news about the league coming out in the course of this discussion, I might consider removing the request. I am also nominating the following related pages because they have no notablity outside the league and, like the USIFL, will likely never play a down. (I am keeping the Lehigh Valley Outlawz and New England Surge articles intact, because they have history in the notable Continental Indoor Football League)
- Bridgeview Red Devils (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Pennsylvania Stillers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Southland Chill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Thank you, Tom Danson (talk) 21:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 21:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Obviously, a major malfunction. Not voting a keep, because there's no news article I can find to report its demise, although this made some news [1]. It isn't hard to figure out what happened; launching a professional sports league during a recession is never a good idea. I agree that the articles about the three teams should be deleted. Mandsford (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Recreate if league gets off the ground, but for now delete league page and delete mentioned teams other than Lehigh Valley and New England because of the teams historys.--Giants27 (t|c) 17:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Chzz ► 18:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. It appears not much has changed since I tagged it for notability concerns back in April. RayTalk 02:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.