Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Socialist Party of Venezuela Youth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

United Socialist Party of Venezuela Youth[edit]

United Socialist Party of Venezuela Youth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent notability, article is based only in primary sources. Jamez42 (talk)

Withdrawing nomination. --Jamez42 (talk) 22:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jamez42 (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Jamez42 (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Jamez42 (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Spanish Wikipedia has an extensive article on the organization. A Google News search indicates many reliable sources [1] It is the youth wing of the ruling party of a medium-sized country. That alone should indicate that there are sources and sustained notability.--TM 23:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per above argument Emass100 (talk) 20:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The parent body United Socialist Party of Venezuela is a registered political party with a WP article. We have WP articles for many official "youth wings" of registered political parties (see categories I have added to this article). As well as above new refs, there are en-refs for notbaility that I will add to the article. Britishfinance (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per TM. ––Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 20:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.