Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Health Services
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 08:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
United Health Services[edit]
- United Health Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Healthcare company seems to fail WP:N. A search of Google News Archives turned up no hits for United Health Services, just a lot of hits for the unrelated UnitedHealth Group. Of the references provided in the article currently, two are primary and one seems to be a press release. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 12:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Simply using the link provided in the AFD itself, I am seeing 2320 hits for the exact name "United Health Services". Many are incidental, but not all are. (Scholar and other links also provide hundreds of mentions.) I haven't exhausted the list to see what qualifies as wp:rs, but the shear volume of mentions in the news seems to completely negate the claim of the nominator, so based on the nomination itself being factually incorrect in asserting there is no news, I would have to say keep. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Media seems to use the abbreviation of UHS more often. Try Googling "UHS"+Binghamton or +"New York", instead of the exact name "United Health Services". 149.125.249.93 (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A bit of google searching indicates that this is a very significant company in the health insurance industry. Article needs much better sourcing to reflect this fact. Perchloric (talk) 02:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.