Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unit (art collective)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) Good afternoon (talk) 12:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unit (art collective)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY, but pro rejected as claims to have notable members, so needs a discussion, which seems fair enough. Has been unreferenced and tagged for notability for almost 7 years. Boleyn (talk) 13:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep It's a minor topic, but it does have a place. It's like one of those bands like the Crucial Three – almost no influence of itself, but the individual members went on to greater things. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:00, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I added a couple of basic links that at least confirm that events occurred but am not finding anything substantial that would indicate critical attention or evaluation of Unit as such. The principals of the group don't appear to have the established notability in their own right which might confer retrospective notability on this group, as suggested above, nor does notability inherit from putting on exhibitions by say John Latham, much of whose career probably preceded the lifespan of the Unit members. Unless someone can identify actual coverage of the group itself, this fails WP:ORGDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 06:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.