Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique Party (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unique Party[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article, non notable. From what I can gather, the party received fewer than 500 votes in total nationally in its only general election. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. The party simply isn't notable. Deletion is totally the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. To be fair, a political party's notability isn't a factor of its vote totals per se — even small fringe parties can be notable enough for inclusion here if they receive sufficient reliable source coverage to clear WP:ORGDEPTH. Rather, the core problem here is the article's complete and total lack of any reliable sources to support its notability at all. And even on the Swedish Wikipedia, the party actually just has a redirect to Linda Thelenius Rosing's BLP, rather than a standalone article about the political party itself — and if the Swedish Wikipedia, where the editor base literally by definition are going to have much better access to archived 15-year-old Swedish media coverage than the rest of us do, still can't find enough sources about a Swedish political party to get it over their notability standards, it can hardly be more notable in English than it is in its own native language. Bearcat (talk) 16:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Small non-notable party. Article has been tagged with a template questioning its notability since 2013. Should be deleted. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 17:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:MILL - completely non-notable. Parties are not automatically notable. This small Swedish party never won an election, and garnered only 500 votes. It does not inherit notability because a celebrity was a member. Bearian (talk) 00:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.