Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union Mills, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 00:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Union Mills, California[edit]

Union Mills, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The basic problem with this one is that I haven't been able to find anything definite about it. The spot (now overrun by urbanization) shows up as a "site" on the oldest topos I can find, which aren't that terribly old. Searching is plagued by false hits, and I haven't found any that I could identify as being this spot which describe it at all or even really hint as to what was here. Maybe Durham has something; Gudde does not. My best guess is that it was a place where gold-bearing rock was processed, but I cannot be sure. There's no indication I can see, however, that it was any sort of town. Mangoe (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nomination; location completely lacks any sort of notability.TH1980 (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.