Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unified Intelligence Agency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The War in 2020. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unified Intelligence Agency[edit]

This fictional agency has no reliable sources, and therefore is not notable. Abductive (talk) 14:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the article about the book. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There are at least two different books, by two different authors, that use this term. Abductive (talk) 15:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - What's the other book? If it already has an article then I suggest keeping this and making it a disambiguation page since there don't seem to be sources establishing its notability outside the fictional worlds. Olaf Davis (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. Redirected per WP:BOLD Ohconfucius (talk) 15:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not redirect during an AFD discussion. That is the same as blanking the page, since you are in fact blanking it, just with one line added to redirect it. If there is only one book this is found in, then I agree on a redirect. If this is an important factor of the book, then the content should be copied over to the main article. Someone who has actually read the book would have to be the judge of that though. Dream Focus 20:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The War in 2020.Dino Velvet 8MM (talk) 04:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 19:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.