Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicity International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Unicity International

Unicity International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline as is not the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Sources are either primary (eg. the text of the company listing in Bloomberg) or trivial (eg. a couple of paragraphs in outlets like The Deseret News). A check for more recent coverage essentially generates reruns of company press releases. Other views welcome. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Euryalus (talk) 20:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete -- wholly unremarkable; just a company going about its business. Sourcing does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not a collection of sales brochures. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.