Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Understanding the Message of the Cross of Jesus Christ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete (CSD G5: the carticle was created by a blocked user using a sockpuppet account.) JamesBWatson (talk) 15:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Understanding the Message of the Cross of Jesus Christ[edit]
- Understanding the Message of the Cross of Jesus Christ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After pruning, it became clear that this book is not notable. The sources (including the ones I removed) are fluffy, unreliable, or primary, and I don't see anything that can be called a decent, independent review. Drmies (talk) 04:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 06:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a single reliable third party source, as far as I can make out. The article was written as blatant promotion by a single purpose editor who does nothing but promote one person, the church that person has founded, his writing, etc. The promotional character of the article has been considerably toned down, but there is still no evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - promotional article by s.p.a. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.