Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Howie Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ill Bill. Nothing sourced to merge. czar ⨹ 20:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uncle Howie Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Non-Notable Record Directory. Lacks Significantly Independent Sources. Dormantos (talk) 16:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard nomination by sockpuppet of blocked account. postdlf (talk) 01:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No independent sources, and can't see any good ones on the web either. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete-not notable. Wgolf (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my vote to Merge. Wgolf (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Ill Bill, see Ill Bill#Merge proposal: Uncle Howie Records to Ill Bill. A much better WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 11:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article can be merged but it won't prove this subject notable. Even it is merged I don't think it will stay long on that page also due to lack of sources. Dormantos (talk) 13:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Disregard comment by sockpuppet account. postdlf (talk) 01:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A merge can essentially end up with one sentence and the term redirecting there. That's what I'd envision here. I've added the sources I could find, but it dfinitely doesn't add up to notability. Boleyn (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ill Bill. If a label is mentioned in a reliable source, but just in passing, it can still go in an article, just not one on its own. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.