Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Una hotels & resorts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Una hotels & resorts[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tag has been there for 6 years, no evidence of notability to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Looks like a possibly self-published advert for a non-notable company. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Can't find any independent writing about the subject. this google search consists solely of self-created social media pages, self-created websites, and self-written press releases. Almost no independent sources seem to be available. --Jayron 32 14:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Change to keep per source found below. The assurances of employees of the company that it is notable means nothing, but Wikimandia's source is good stuff. --Jayron 32 16:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Jayron32 the proper way to search is to put the term in quotes and it will find that exact match, as Unapamela pointed out. Otherwise you get 1 billion search results because it looks for all pages that have "UNA", and pages that have "hotels", and pages with the word "resorts" (and not necessarily all those words together). —Мандичка^YO 😜 16:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Makes no difference, because either way the top 50 results are still social media pages created by the company itself, either with or without the quotes. --Jayron 32 16:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jayron32 That is because you're not actually searching the Google NEWS section.... ie the one that is linked at the top of this page... where it says "Find sources: News" ..... The link to the Google search you posted above shows that you are not searching the NEWS section. Let's sum up: Search the news section for news. —Мандичка^YO 😜 17:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you arguing with me? Are you hoping to get me to change my vote back to delete? I can find no reasonable answer why you would want to pick a fight with someone who specifically changed their vote to agree with you. You're not making any sense. Can't you just let me agree with you and be done with it? I've been here for 10 years, and I've probably commented on more AFDs than you have total edits. I think I know what I'm doing, thank you very much. You really don't have to pick a fight with me anymore, I've already agreed with you. --Jayron 32 22:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notable company and you can find it with the exact name "UNA Hotels & Resorts". It is an Italian Hotel Chain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unapamela (talk • contribs) 15:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It appears the above user is connected to the company, see Wikipedia:Help desk#Change title of an article. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - 31 hotels in the chain is a pretty good size and the Wall Street Journal thinks so too. WSJ does not publish news stories about investors making bids for "non-notable" companies. One of several articles that have covered the ownership of the hotel, people bidding to buy it etc. There are 186 results in news search. —Мандичка^YO 😜 16:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per all of above. —HaRvEyWaRbUrN^TaLk 14:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everyone above - Simply needs expanding. –Davey2010^Talk 22:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.