Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Una Mamea Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Una Mamea Park[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently this is some sort of a weird local controversy, it's been covered a couple of times by Jutarnji list [1], Nova TV [2], Večernji list [3]. Wikipedia should not be used as a vehicle for promotional activities, and at the same time the controversy itself does not rise to the level of being worthy of describing by the encyclopedia. Joy (talk) 20:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Joy (talk) 20:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Geography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear from Jutarnji this is not actually a park but looks to be some sort of a scam. SportingFlyer T·C 20:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Štrbački buk, which is the site where this guy has declared a park. This "weird local controversy" could maybe be an addition to that article, but not at this point one of its own. -- D'n'B-t -- 17:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with describing this on par with everything else there is that it would likely give WP:undue weight to the topic. --Joy (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly, adding anything to the target article would have to be done with care. Redirecting without making any addition would also do just fine. -- D'n'B-t -- 19:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.