Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UnThreat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 08:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UnThreat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2 or 3 minor reviews here probably do not show notability . Accepted from afc despite that DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Ref provided are download sites with a sentence or two at most describing the software and do not establish notability. A search turned up additional download sites, the toms guide link being the most detailed, and forum posts, but not enough significant RS coverage to establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 20:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reliable and significant coverage does not exist. - tucoxn\^talk 23:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hopefully a case of WP:TOOSOON. I find blogs and reviews on shareware sites, but nothing from RSes. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.