Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umut Kekıllı

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - nominator withdrew (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Umut Kekıllı[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Turkish footballer. I'm no football expert, but this guy's bio has far less sources than we expect a BLP to have, raising concerns both regarding WP:V and WP:N generally, and WP:NFOOTY specifically, as it seems that the teams he played for did not play in top-level leagues. But there may be relevant Turkish-language sources. Sandstein 19:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Kekıllı appeared in 6 Turkish Super Lig (fully-pro league) matches for Kocaelispor which satisfies NFOOTY. Article needs some work, but that's not a reason to delete. Jogurney (talk) 03:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jogurney passes WP:FOOTY has played 6 matches in a WP:FPL Süper Lig for Kocaelispor .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He has played in the Turkish Super Lig, meaning the article passes WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. The above is not convincing - to retain a WP:BLP, we still require reliable sources, and per WP:GNG, we still require substantial coverage in reliable sources. However, surprisingly, the man is covered by the German lowbrow media as a participant in a dancing show, e.g. at [1]. I suppose that's enough to barely satisfy requirements. Sandstein 18:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.