Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbilical venous catheterisation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to Umbilical line. by JFW. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 21:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Umbilical venous catheterisation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously tagged under CSD. While the procedure itself may not be notable, it could, perhaps be merged into another article - but on it's own I'm not seeing it warranting an article at this time. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 22:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a notable technique, documented in detail in papers such as Serious complications of umbilical venous catheterisation and Reminder of important clinical lesson: Cardiac arrhythmias associated with umbilical venous catheterisation in neonates. Warden (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected this to umbilical line, which covers both arterial and venous catheters. JFW | T@lk 20:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.