Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar Khan (actor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Umar Khan (actor)[edit]

Umar Khan (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, fails WP:NARTIST. Störm (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 04:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The subject clearly fails notability test, there needs to be signficant coverage in multiple secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject per WP:GNG. The only independent sources here is the interview, and that's primary. Tushar.ghone (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.