Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar Khan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete . Unreferenced BLP. Even the single keep says he's probably not more than marginal. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 20:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Umar Khan[edit]
- Umar Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Limited notability. Looks like an up-and coming actor, but not yet encyclopedic. gordonrox24 (talk) 01:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable bit part actor and stuntman. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Might be notable someday, but not yet. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Possibly not more than marginally notable, but fairly long list of things he's done, and the article is significantly wikilinked and interwikilinked, so the article seems to fill a role. Tomas e (talk) 17:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm -- not sure if someone can be notable for doing many non-notable things. The man obviously has a good resume as a stuntman/fighter etc but is he notable as one? I tend to think no, but others may disagree. I think the interwiking and wikilinks issue isn't relevant to the subject's notability in any way however. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The SE Wikipedia article on him was deleted.--gordonrox24 (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm -- not sure if someone can be notable for doing many non-notable things. The man obviously has a good resume as a stuntman/fighter etc but is he notable as one? I tend to think no, but others may disagree. I think the interwiking and wikilinks issue isn't relevant to the subject's notability in any way however. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.