Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultima IX: Redemption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to Ultima IX per Wikipedia:Deletion policy. --Tony Sidaway 03:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ultima IX: Redemption[edit]

I prodded this one back on the 21st as a non-notable fan project, but 132.205.45.110 removed the prod on this one as well (see the AFD on Mao Kabayashi above), stating that "This should go to AfD not PROD". So it's here. It's still a non-notable fan project which doesn't appear to have publicly released anything yet - so let's delete it. Zetawoof^(ζ) 21:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fan prodject still in production. --E ivind ^t ^@^c 23:32, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable fan project that doesn't seem to have much influence on the Ultima series in general, nor is the article particuarly constructive.--Cini 08:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (with chainsaw-trimming) into Ultima IX for now, as much as I hate saying that, being a big fan of their work. I originally added mentions of this to Ultima (and, I think, Ultima IX). Just mentions. I believe completed Ultima fan projects are notable (Lazarus, for example), but there's been a lot of just-gone-belly-up Ultima fan projects... not that I'd believe Redemption is in any danger. =) I don't think upcoming projects are worth discussing for more than a short section. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I am one of the composers and creative consultants on the project, and I mainly wrote the article to let more people know about it. However, I fully understand the vanity rules, and agree. However, in terms of notability, our project was mentioned in Computer Games Magazine a few years ago along with some other remakes in an article. I would need to check my issue at home to give you the details. However, if you choose to delete the article I will completely understand, and am not offended at all. Thanks.

Chlorthos Dragon 20:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.